Aging in Focus: Systems of Health and Care
Viewed through a sociological lens, aging is not only a personal journey but an evolving system within other structural systems that are also evolving. Gerontologists define age as multidimensional in chronological, biological, psychological, and social aging(Saylor). Theories of aging described in “Understanding Social Problems” are Disengagement theory, Conflict theory, and Activity theory. Disengagement theory, mirrors functional theory, assumes “passing the butane” allows role replacement maintaining social stability. Activity theory assumes the aging individual and society benefit when they stay active in their roles. And Conflict theory focuses on the inequality impact of ageism, stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination of the older populations.
Foundational social tensions are found within the social structure of aging through the lens of disengagement, activity, and conflict theory. Viewing the question of retirement being a health transition or a socially accepted exclusion which creates the tension of withdraw vs engagement. Analyzing the conflict of valuing older adults for earlier input and wisdom or resented for current economic output creating the tension of stability vs productivity. And asking if the aging population is naturally withdrawing or is society excluding them creates the tension of biology vs social construction.
(Healthy Aging at any Age https://www.cdc.gov/healthy-aging/about/index.html)
Transitioning to the institutional arena of health and health care systems the social tension of aging becomes more visible. As Chapter 13 in Understanding Social Problems explains the disparities in coverage, cost, and access. How a society organizes the structure of their health care system exposes the underlying value and belief about their aging population. By defining if society views aging as a share social responsibility or an individual burden.
Defining health as a multidimensional concept that refers to a person physical, mental, and social wellbeing. Practicing medicine is using the provisions of healthcare services to prevent, diagnose, treat illnesses, and promote wellness(Saylor).
Layering the main sociology perspectives and navigating the central questions of each will highlight the tensions of the global national health insurance compared to the US Private Pay healthcare systems. Functionalism asks on the macro systems level, “Does this healthcare structure maintain social stability”? Conflict theory also on a macro level focus on inequality ask, “Who controls the healthcare system and who benefits”? Zooming in on a micro individual experience Interaction theory asks, “How do people experience and interpret healthcare?”
(https://imana.org/world-health-day-2024-advocate-universal-health-care-with-imana/)
For the Functionalist perspective the stabilizing mechanism of the US Private Pay is the market drive and innovation and in the universal healthcare the stabilizer is the guaranteed coverage. In layering the conflict theory, insurance and pharmaceutical companies hold the power and the inequalities are found within class, gender, and race in the US private. For the universal healthcare the state or govern body hold the power and acess reduces the inequalities overall. The interaction experience individuals have with the US private pay is characterized as uncertainty because insurance status defines access and through the universal healthcare system individual's interaction experience security through shared citizenship.
After analyzing the sociology perspectives on both the US Private Pay system and the Universal Healthcare system foundational tensions that divide are found as delay vs denied, collective responsibility vs individual responsibility, public regulations vs corporate profit, quality of access vs freedom of market. In short, US private pay treats healthcare as a market commodity and Universal systems treat healthcare is a public good and both systems function by relay on different stabilizers.The Universal system trade speed and market freedom for equity and security and the US Private pay trades equity and guarantee access for market driven innovation(Universal Health Care vs Private Pay).
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/15/3289
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153289
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153289
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is not “your grandmother’s arthritis” it is an autoimmune disease where the immune system attacks the lining of joints causing pain and can also affect organs like heart, lungs, and eyes. There are no known preventions of RA but strategies to slow development include avoid smoking, early treatment, and healthy life habits. Most common treatments for RA are methods of targeting the inflammation through immune suppressant and biological medications, physical and occupational therapies, dietary, lifestyle management, and surgery(Center for Disease Control and Prevention). Xu and Wu presented the RA social factor disparities among the US in their 2005 report that woman are 75% of RA suffers, Native American/Black populations have a higher severity of symptoms, between the ages of 60-75 years is the highest diagnostic time frame, an lower educated and low income demographic have the highest risk and have poorer outcomes.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. Accessed April 8, 2024.
Prevalence trend and disparities in RA among US Adults 2005-18
Saylor Academy. Social Problems: Continuity and Change. Saylor Academy, 2012.
Universal Healthcare vs. Private Insurance.” Solace Health, Solace Health, 2026, https://www.solace.health/glossary/universal-healthcare-vs-private-insurance#:~:text=Universal%20healthcare%20is%20a%20system%2C%20deductibles%2C%20and%20provider%20networks. Accessed 19 Feb. 2026.
Xu, Y., & Wu, Q. (2021). Prevalence Trend and Disparities in Rheumatoid Arthritis among US Adults, 2005–2018. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(15), 3289.

